2016 hasn’t been a great year for the Supreme Court. February saw the passing of Justice Scalia, whose self-professed mission was to interpret the law using a principled, apolitical methodology that respected the role of an independent judiciary in a democracy. And when President Obama attempted to replace Justice Scalia, Republican Senators dishonored Justice Scalia’s judicial philosophy. The Senate Judiciary Committee cynically refused to even allow a vote on Judge Merrick Garland, a well-qualified, moderate nominee, so that Republican-appointees could continue to constitute a majority of the Supreme Court. With a new President-elect who displays an apparent lack of knowledge of constitutional law, the Supreme Court’s legitimacy as a nonpartisan institution that safeguards our constitutional rights is now more important than ever.
One bright spot in this bleak SCOTUS year is a new podcast that covers the Court expertly and candidly. Ian Samuel and Dan Epps, both former Supreme Court clerks, recently launched First Mondays. This podcast, inter alia, reviews grants of certiorari, discusses oral arguments, and makes predictions about both the outcomes of cases and which Justice will be assigned to author the majority opinion for each case. Samuel and Epps present both sides of each case charitably, and allow the listener to understand the import of the outcome of a case and the nuances of the doctrine. They share nuggets about litigant strategy and provide tips about the Justices’ thinking while never allowing the listener to forget that legal reasoning matters. They host guests who are experts in their fields and make areas of law as abstruse as Johnson retroactivity and bankruptcy settlements scintillating. They banter about securities fraud.